NanoGPT

I understand that you rely on many different providers for models, including open-source models in the subscription. However, it isn't clearly written anywhere which models are hosted by which providers. (Or maybe I'm just not looking hard enough.) Any chance you could disclose this information somewhere on the site? Like, "Primary provider for X is Fireworks, fallback Chutes", as an example. Adding a note about it for the "Available Models" list under the "</> API" tab would feel intuitive, for example.

I noticed your site and API are behind the Cloudflare proxy/CDN. Cloudflare inspects and routes all visitor traffic, which can expose users’ IP addresses and request data to a third party and centralizes metadata that could be retained or accessed. For better privacy and to avoid third‑party interception of user requests, please consider removing the Cloudflare proxy (or configure DNS only / self‑hosted CDN) so visitors connect directly to your origin servers. Thank you.

Please consider adding generation settings such as Min-P, this is really helpful since most of prompts and presets for roleplay comes along with generation settings and its bad that nanoGPT API does not support Min-P setting.

I remember that NanoGPT used to advertise "zero data retention" agreements with their LLM providers. At some point this language has been removed (or I'm misremembering) and replaced with "minimum data retention", which is a far more nebulous term, though even "zero data retention" does not have a standardized definition among providers (especially regarding abuse detection). Can you disclose which providers you have special data retention agreements with and what those terms are? It would go a long way to help the transparency of this platform.

You guys are a little too fast at adding new features to the website/API. I often only find very useful features (like this new suggestion board) months after they launch because they don't seem to be announced anywhere other than your Discord. Can you please merge what you announce on Discord and the updates section on the website into a unified changelog? Ideally this would be backdated to include everything you've added thus far as well.

I'm primarily using PayPal, so having it as a payment option would be nice

Is there a way to see supported TPS for each model like OpenRouter displays?

Either on a per-conversation level (where the web-search/thinking/memory toggles are), a per-preset level, globally, or through prompt tag eg <CURRENT_TIME> (in the manner you already have <CURRENT_DATE>) Plz I beg, I need my character to stop hallucinating timestamps and arguing when I say it's X time but they think it's Y. And it's a big boost for immersion in general when prompt engineering ❤️

Hello! Z-Image Turbo is super cheap to run and is good enough quality for most of my needs, where the other models in the subscription don't quite meet my requirements. It would be super awesome if that model could be included in the subscription please! Thank you

More filter options for models (all of them) would be useful, such as "can be coaxed easily into NSFW", "does not guarantee privacy", etc...

Maybe people will pay for it, monthly limits can be toned down for those two models.

I think it would be a good addition to include details about when a model was last updated or uploaded. Why? For example, the recent appearance of the Mistral Large 3 model. It appears in the available models list, but I'm not sure if it's the new version or an older one. While it might have "2512" at the end of the model name, this doesn't guarantee a specific date, as the other existing models don't have anything like that.

Qwen3 Embedding 0.6B A powerful and cheap Embedding model that is also open source and available here: https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B, it would also be nice to obtain vectors without spending API requests.

Allow finer control of API key usage, including daily RPD and daily NANO consumption allowed.

1. Allow a sync option for presets (System Prompts) across devices on my account 2. Allow attaching custom advanced parameters to presets (Synced along with it) 3. Maybe add an "export all presets to json" option for account switching (import). Currently I must always set up new presets for new devices.

AI isn't aware by default of the current date, time and timezone of the user. For providing time-sensitive suggestions, an option to auto-add the users current time to prompts would be helpful. Then the AI could respond: for this interaction in this business communication, get back with the client on X of Jan at ~14:00 As an extension to this: Said response from the AI could be used to sort the conversations list, so that those contacts that require interaction earlier show above the ones with later dates. A more general approach to dynamic titles would be for the user to instruct the AI to respond in a certain format -like some sort of front-matter - that holds the next date to follow up. NanoGPT could interpret hints like this (and others) and adapt it's views accordingly. This are effectively three suggestions that could be considered separately. Feel free to split as you see fit.

Sometimes a reasoning model gets interrupted, and does not finish the task. Currently i make them continue by sending a message that just says "continue". Maybe it's better to provide a separate button to continue generating.

For those of us less organized, it would be nice to have option in all conversations tab to select multiple chats from a given page and have the option to apply a function from the three dot menu that you would normally only be able to apply for a chat one at a time and not even be able to select another without returning back to all conversations screen.

Would be nice to add Google drive files straight to the model instead of downloading first

Improve error messages on failed generation: Generation Error Failed to generate images. Please try again. Unclear why the error is occurring, upstream provider unresponsive? token limit?

Or gift cards/voucher codes that can be purchased with cash from somewhere.

Currently there are no rejected submissions and the placeholder text says "Be the first to submit an idea!", implying to suggest an idea to get rejected. Would be better to replace the text with something like "All of your ideas are good so far!". Or reject this idea. That would be funny.

I would love to see Ministral 8b and Ministral 3b added, as well as the Mixtral 8x7b & 8x22b Models, if that would be possible

Hello, I would love to see Midnight Miqu models on nanoGPT's model list (included in the subscription, if possible). Since a significant number of people use nanoGPT for roleplay, it would be beneficial to consider adding a dedicated roleplay model like Midnight Miqu, given how well it generates responses.

Please add an option to protect past conversations with pincode or 2FA

Automatically choose the aspect ratio for generated image based on the original image.

Due to the free, subscription-based GLM providers being way too slow sometimes, I'd like it if the thinking/reasoning version of the Original GLM 4.7 was also offered. I *could* just get it directly from z.ai, but... I'd rather get all my API's from here, neat and organized.

Perplexity as Search Option (BYOK)

Models like GLM 4.7 and MiniMax M2/M2.1 now recommend passing `reasoning_content` or `reasoning_details` back into the context for enhanced reasoning performance. See https://docs.z.ai/guides/capabilities/thinking-mode and https://platform.minimax.io/docs/guides/text-m2-function-call. Is this possible with NanoGPT's OpenAI-compatible API? Or does it perhaps need an Anthropic-compatible API? And if so, can I suggest some clarity in the docs on how this might work?

It would be great to add all Qwen3 embedding and reranking models to the subscription: Qwen3-Embedding-8B Qwen3-Embedding-4B Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B Qwen3-Reranker-8B Qwen3-Reranker-4B Qwen3-Reranker-0.6B Currently, such models are becoming increasingly necessary for codebase indexing and RAG tasks. As far as I have seen, competitors already offer these models within their subscriptions.

I believe you said you're going to bring this back, that was a while ago though

The HTML editor is very small and can't be resized on mobile devices. I suggest adding an option to expand the preview to full screen. Another thing is that the hide preview button doesn't work.

HI in the google tts documentations there is a option for appliying instructions for the tts but nano gpt does support that feature please add that feature too

Would it be possible to add embedding models to the subscription?

As the title says. Makes it easier to add in more context if needed, or allow back and forth conversation.

Sup.Ai is doing something really cool that I bet you guys could implement. They give the user the ability to submit to multiple models, which you have, but instead of just returning the results, they pass all three results through a model to evaluate the responses and construct a consensus using the best aspects of each response. Then, they return the final consensus to the user. The idea is that while one model might hallucinate or write poorly, it's unlikely that they all would at the same time. I would love to, for example, be able to combine Deepseek, GLM and Kimi K2 or something like that. The biggest trick, here, would be how you prompt the final model to generate a useful consensus, but if you pulled it off, it would be incredible. Another advantage is that if a model is unavailable or unwilling to complete the task, another model will, so the user never experiences a dropped response.

Please consider adding 2FA using authenticator apps. This would act as an additional layer of security.

Primarily: Text LLM models already have the ability to be Favorited/Star'd. Add the same functionality to the UI for Image models as well. And videos as well, while you are at it. Appears to be the same UI element (?) so should be fairly simple. Secondarily, it's tough to search through the Image model menu for the 4 or so models that are included with the sub. Add the toggle to Show Only Subscription Models like you already have for Text LLMs. :)

Problem: some client libraries for OpenAI compatible APIs expect format specification for embeddings to work (base64 is an option officially). Example for such a library: OpenAI official nuget package

It would be great to have suno available for music generation in nano-gpt. I love your work!

Hello NanoGPT team! A suggestion I have is to provide vouchers like Mullvad does so people can deposit money anonymously without needing crypto. I didn't want to deal with the tax headache of cryptocurrencies, so I used the stripe process to add funds. I was under the impression that personal information would not be knowable by NanoGPT, but I can see my personal information under billing so you surely must have access, right? Vouchers would enable a clean separation for those like myself which do not want to rely on trust.

DeepSeek Math V2 is a new model that appears excellent at mathematical reasoning. Like other DeepSeek models, it is open source and available here: https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Math-V2 It would be great if it could be included in the subscription models. It would likely be useful for those in academia or working with quantitative methods. Thank you very much!

Hi, I would be very useful, if you would allow to upload multiple images as references for seedream as the model allows for it. I need to generate multiple reference images elsewhere but would prefer nanogpt

I want to make the API pricing easier to understand. This includes showing the price for image inputs and for video generation with or without audio. Some models do not have pricing, so I also want to clearly show which features each model can access, such as whether image input is allowed.

It would be good to e.g. take screenshots without saving them to disk, instead saving them to clipboard and pasting into the chat. It is possible to do that, e.g. yandex reverse image search can accept clipboard images.

enable a toggle that filters to show only the BYOK providers you've saved a key for.

Left sidebar no w ay to scroll back up once reach bottom. VS style folder view dropdowns for sections likes Resources, Workspaces in the current left side bar good.

I think a lot of people (like me) run their own Nextcloud instance on a VPS. Having that for sync would actually be amazing.

This is an idea to provide an easier, more private way to develop more complex software. The concept would be that NanoGPT provides an encrypted and fully private storage chunk where project files (code, folder structure, documentation) can be uploaded. This does not need to be super large in size. Then, using the already existing models in NanoGPT, the user can define an architect main AI that plans and conducts the sub-agents and, if desired, a second AI model acting as the executing sub-agent. Also all could be done by the same model of course if desired. The models would have permission to alter the files in that one project environment they are assigned to. There would be several (disposable, temporary) environments the user can set up for different projects or versions of projects. Access per environment can be granted and revoked to and from models. Things would always remain silo-ed and seperate. Zip file upload and download could be possible where the uploaded zip is meant to be unpacked in the environment to create the folder structure of the application or development. Internet access of the agent / sub agents shall be under user control. Storage fees are charged per used time and storage amount. I don't know if this could be possible but it would be quite cool. It would expand NanoGPT to go beyond some of the limitations of chat mechanics natively. Also it could be used for other projects apart from coding of course, such as research and planning.

Hi, yes this is now working. Thank you.