GLM 5.1 Thinking TEE

GLM-5.1 with extended reasoning mode for multi-step planning and tool-heavy workflows. Running inside a TEE (Trusted Execution Environment), with provider attestation support.

  • Reasoning
  • Tool Calling
  • Structured Output

Added Apr 20, 2026

Model weights

Pricing

Auto routing · per 1M tokens
Input
$0.70
Output
$2.50
Cache read
$0.18

Specifications

Context window
202.8K
Max output
65.5K
Parameters
744B / 40B
Total / active
Avg output (7d)
1.3K tokens
Longer than 80% of models

Benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

26.1

Better than 79% of models compared

Coding Index

55.8

Better than 65% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

20.3%

Better than 40% of models compared

AutomationBench-AA Tasks Completed

Fully completed workflows without guardrail violations

3.0%

Better than 40% of models compared

AA-Briefcase v1.1

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

965 Elo

Better than 45% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2.1

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

1116 Elo

Better than 53% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

8.4%

Better than 36% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

73.7%

Better than 69% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

30.1%

Better than 77% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

76.3%

Better than 95% of models compared

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

2.0%

Better than 47% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

44.8%

Better than 36% of models compared

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

86.8%

Better than 82% of models compared

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Agentic coding and terminal use

43.2%

Better than 90% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

97.7%

Better than 98% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

73.7%

Better than 69% of models compared

Last updated Oct 19, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Choose explicit providers for this model. Auto routing remains available as the default option.

Loading provider options…