Browse all Meta text models
Provider logo

Llama 4 Maverick

meta-llama/llama-4-maverick
Provider logo

Llama 4 Maverick

meta-llama/llama-4-maverick

Llama 4 Maverick, a 17 billion active parameter model with 128 experts, is the best multimodal model in its class, beating GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash across a broad range of widely reported benchmarks, while achieving comparable results to the new DeepSeek v3 on reasoning and coding—at less than half the active parameters. Llama 4 Maverick offers a best-in-class performance to cost ratio with an experimental chat version scoring ELO of 1417 on LMArena.

Added Sep 5, 2025

Model weights

Context Window

1.0M

Max Output

65.5K

Avg output tokens (7d)

138 tokens

9%

Input Price (Auto)

$0.15/1M

Output Price (Auto)

$0.60/1M

Cache Read (Auto)

$0.075/1M

Capabilities

Benchmarks

Performance metrics and benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

9.3

Better than 39% of models compared

Coding Index

16.3

Better than 19% of models compared

Agentic Index

0.6

Better than 4% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

0.2%

Better than 4% of models compared

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

0 Elo

Better than 2% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

-45 Elo

Better than 4% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

0.8%

Better than 6% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

50.0%

Better than 47% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

4.9%

Better than 28% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

43.0%

Better than 46% of models compared

CritPt

Research-level physics reasoning

0.0%

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

0.0%

Better than 17% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

31.7%

Better than 11% of models compared

LiveCodeBench

Contamination-free coding benchmark

39.7%

Better than 46% of models compared

Math

AIME 2025

American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025

19.3%

Better than 22% of models compared

AIME

American Invitational Mathematics Examination

39.0%

Better than 63% of models compared

Math-500

Diverse mathematical problem solving benchmark

88.9%

Better than 61% of models compared

Knowledge

MMLU-Pro

Professional and academic subject knowledge

80.9%

Better than 72% of models compared

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Proportion of correctly answered questions

24.9%

AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses

88.9%

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

67.1%

Better than 44% of models compared

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Agentic coding and terminal use

6.8%

Better than 37% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

17.8%

Better than 16% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

50.0%

Better than 47% of models compared

GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)

Economically valuable tasks

0.0%

Last updated Sep 13, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Choose explicit providers for this model. Auto routing remains available as the default option.

Loading provider options…

Compare Llama 4 Maverick with similar models from the same provider or model family.