Sep 18, 2025
Running AI models on OpenShift can be expensive if resources aren't managed well. Overprovisioning wastes money, while underprovisioning causes performance problems. The solution? Use autoscaling tools like Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) to adjust pod replicas based on demand and Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) to fine-tune resource allocation. Here's how to save costs and maintain performance:
Managing resources effectively in OpenShift can help you cut costs and improve performance. If you don’t configure things properly, you may end up overpaying for unused resources or dealing with performance issues that can hinder your AI applications. Understanding the basics of resource management lays the groundwork for implementing precise autoscaling strategies.
OpenShift uses a request and limit system to control how much CPU and memory each container can use. Requests guarantee a minimum amount of resources, while limits set a maximum cap. This system allows the OpenShift scheduler to make smarter decisions about where to run your AI workloads.
Resource requests specify the minimum CPU and memory your AI model needs to function. OpenShift’s scheduler relies on these requests to find nodes with enough available resources. If you underestimate these values, your model may end up on an overloaded node, leading to performance issues. Overestimating, on the other hand, can result in wasted capacity.
Resource limits define the maximum resources a container is allowed to consume. If a container exceeds its memory limit, OpenShift will terminate it to protect other workloads. CPU limits, however, work differently - they throttle CPU usage instead of killing the container.
Memory limits are particularly important for AI models, which can have unpredictable memory demands. For instance, a model that usually uses 2GB of memory might spike to 4GB during complex inference tasks. Properly setting memory limits ensures that one process doesn’t overwhelm the node and disrupt other workloads.
CPU usage behaves differently from memory. When CPU limits are too strict, containers may be throttled, causing performance slowdowns during high-demand periods like inference spikes.
Getting these settings right is essential for optimizing both autoscaling and costs, which will be discussed further in later sections.
Set memory requests to reflect typical usage and configure limits to be 20-30% higher to handle unexpected spikes. For example, if your AI model typically uses 3GB of RAM, you could set the request at 3GB and the limit at 4GB. This approach provides flexibility without wasting resources.
Avoid setting CPU limits unless absolutely necessary. Instead, use CPU requests to ensure your model gets the processing power it needs. This allows your workloads to take advantage of available CPU cycles during peak demand without being throttled.
Leverage OpenShift monitoring tools to track actual resource usage and adjust settings based on real-world data. Fine-tuning your configurations in this way ensures they align with your workloads’ behavior instead of relying on guesswork.
Different types of AI models have unique resource needs. For instance, language models often require more memory, while computer vision models tend to prioritize CPU. Tailor your resource profiles to suit these specific demands.
To maintain control and fairness across your cluster, use resource quotas at the namespace level. This prevents any single AI project from monopolizing resources, ensuring balanced distribution and helping manage costs.
The goal is to strike a balance where your AI models have just enough resources to perform efficiently without over-provisioning. Start with conservative settings and refine them based on usage data as your workloads evolve.
Autoscaling adjusts resources dynamically to meet demand, helping to cut down on unnecessary expenses. OpenShift provides several autoscaling tools that can help you manage AI infrastructure costs while ensuring performance remains steady. The trick lies in selecting the right mix of strategies to suit your workload patterns.
Let’s break down some effective approaches to scaling.
These two methods of autoscaling are key to keeping resource usage efficient and costs under control.
Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) adjusts the number of pod replicas based on real-time metrics like CPU usage, memory consumption, or even custom indicators. For instance, if your AI model faces a surge in inference requests, HPA spins up additional pods to handle the load. Once the demand subsides, it scales back down to avoid over-provisioning.
To get the most out of HPA, set target utilization thresholds that match your workload’s behavior. This ensures a balance between responsiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA), on the other hand, focuses on optimizing the resource allocation of individual pods. By analyzing historical usage data, VPA adjusts CPU and memory requests and limits, making it ideal for AI models with fluctuating resource needs. It can either recommend adjustments or apply them automatically.
When used together, HPA and VPA can be a powerful duo. HPA ensures the right number of pods, while VPA makes sure each pod is properly resourced. However, running both in automatic mode simultaneously can lead to conflicts. A good starting point is to use VPA in recommendation mode to gather insights before enabling automatic updates.
Standard metrics like CPU and memory usage are useful, but custom metrics can provide a more tailored approach for AI workloads. Custom metric autoscaling allows you to scale based on AI-specific indicators such as GPU usage, inference queue length, or response times.
For example, if request queues start to pile up, scaling up can prevent delays in processing. Similarly, monitoring response latency - especially high-percentile response times - can help you identify when to scale up to maintain a smooth user experience. This ensures your system reacts appropriately to real demand without overcompensating for brief traffic spikes.
While custom metrics may require additional monitoring tools, the precision they offer can lead to significant cost savings by matching resource allocation closely to actual needs.
If your AI application has usage patterns that are easy to predict, time-based scaling can be a highly effective way to save costs. For example, if your models are mostly used during business hours or are tied to batch processing tasks, you can scale down resources during off-peak times.
OpenShift’s CronJobs make it simple to implement time-based scaling. You can schedule tasks to adjust replica counts or resource allocations based on expected demand. For instance, an application supporting customer service might scale down significantly overnight when usage drops.
To cover unexpected traffic spikes, you can combine time-based scaling with HPA. This hybrid approach ensures cost savings during predictable periods while maintaining responsiveness when demand suddenly increases.
For batch processing, consider running intensive jobs during off-peak hours when compute resources are often less expensive. Over time, monitor and refine your schedules based on actual usage data to maximize savings and maintain performance.
Optimizing your OpenShift cluster isn’t just about scaling individual pods - it’s about refining how workloads are distributed across your entire infrastructure. The objective? To get the most out of your compute resources while ensuring your AI models perform at their best.
Think of the OpenShift scheduler as the air traffic controller of your cluster. It decides where each pod should run, and fine-tuning its settings can significantly impact both performance and cost, especially for demanding AI workloads.
Beyond scheduler tweaks, managing nodes effectively can further enhance performance and reduce costs.
OpenShift’s descheduler is a handy tool for rebalancing workloads. The LowNodeUtilization profile is particularly useful for AI tasks. It identifies underused nodes and redistributes their workloads to other nodes, improving resource density. This means fewer nodes are needed to handle the same workload, leading to direct cost savings.
Here’s how it works: the descheduler monitors CPU, memory, and pod counts across the cluster. If it spots nodes operating below optimal thresholds, it moves their workloads to more active nodes. The result? Better efficiency without sacrificing performance.
Node resource profiles let you align hardware capabilities with workload needs. Instead of a one-size-fits-all setup, you can create specialized node groups. For example, memory-intensive models can run on high-RAM nodes, while compute-heavy training jobs are assigned to CPU-optimized ones. This tailored approach ensures each workload gets the resources it needs without waste.
Finding the right balance is essential. Running nodes at over 90% utilization might cut costs, but it leaves little room for unexpected traffic surges. Aiming for 70-80% utilization strikes a good balance between cost efficiency and responsiveness, especially for AI workloads that require quick scaling.
Cluster autoscaling adds or removes nodes based on demand. For workloads with predictable usage patterns, you can configure the autoscaler to scale down aggressively during low-demand periods and ramp up quickly when activity spikes.
Once your workloads are optimally distributed, ongoing monitoring is key to maintaining efficiency. As your AI applications grow or change, what worked initially might need adjustment.
With Prometheus and Grafana integration, you gain detailed insights into node utilization, pod resource use, and scheduling efficiency. Key metrics to watch include CPU and memory usage, pod scheduling delays, and signs of resource waste.
Regularly revisiting policies is crucial. For instance, a model that initially required heavy CPU resources might shift to being more memory-intensive after optimization. Adjusting your scheduling and scaling strategies ensures resources are always aligned with workload demands.
Capacity planning becomes more precise when you analyze historical data. By studying past resource usage trends, you can make informed decisions about node sizing, scaling parameters, and resource allocation. These insights help you anticipate future needs and avoid inefficiencies.
Finally, configure custom alerts tailored to your AI workloads. For example, set alerts for GPU memory exhaustion or inference queue backups. These targeted alerts let you address issues before they escalate, preventing disruptions or unnecessary scaling.
The best results come from combining automation with regular oversight. OpenShift’s tools handle day-to-day adjustments, but periodic reviews of performance data ensure your cluster remains optimized as your AI workloads evolve.
Building on the earlier discussion about autoscaling and resource management, keeping AI deployments cost-efficient requires a smart approach to allocating resources and controlling spending while maintaining performance and reliability.
Getting the right balance in resource allocation is key to managing costs effectively. Over-provisioning means you're paying for unused capacity, while underutilization wastes money on resources that aren't being fully leveraged.
To avoid these pitfalls:
By keeping an eye on these factors, you can ensure resources are used effectively and spending stays under control. Additionally, setting clear quotas can help manage costs across different projects.
Project-level quotas are an effective way to cap costs and prevent runaway resource consumption, especially for AI workloads where a single misconfigured training job can quickly rack up expenses.
Here’s how to manage quotas effectively:
These practices align well with broader cost-management strategies, ensuring resources are allocated efficiently without compromising performance.
In addition to internal controls, external platforms can provide additional flexibility for managing expenses. For example, NanoGPT offers advanced AI models through a pay-as-you-go model, eliminating the need for fixed infrastructure costs.
With NanoGPT, you only pay for what you use - starting at $0.10 per query - making it a cost-effective option for running large language models or image-generation systems. This approach avoids the financial burden of maintaining GPU-intensive infrastructure.
Privacy is another consideration when choosing platforms. NanoGPT addresses privacy concerns by keeping data stored locally on user devices instead of external servers. This combines the cost advantages of a managed service with the privacy benefits of local processing.
For many workloads, a hybrid strategy works best. For instance, lightweight preprocessing or postprocessing tasks can run on your OpenShift cluster, while compute-heavy model inference is offloaded to a managed service like NanoGPT. This way, you can optimize costs by matching each workload component to the most suitable computing platform.
Pay-as-you-go services also simplify capacity planning. Instead of provisioning infrastructure to handle peak demand - which often leads to underused and expensive resources - you can handle traffic spikes dynamically without pre-allocating GPU resources. This is particularly useful for applications with unpredictable or spiky usage patterns.
When deciding between managed platforms and dedicated infrastructure, consider your workload needs. High-frequency, low-latency applications may benefit from dedicated infrastructure, while batch processing or user-facing applications with moderate response time requirements often work well with managed services.
The key is to align platform capabilities with your specific needs. For tasks like custom model fine-tuning or specialized inference, self-hosted solutions might offer greater control. But for standard tasks like text generation or image creation, managed services like NanoGPT provide a cost-effective and operationally efficient option.
Scaling AI models on OpenShift efficiently requires smart resource management, autoscaling, and cost controls. By combining these strategies, you can build a deployment plan that balances performance and budget.
Resource allocation is the starting point for cost-effective scaling. By setting CPU and memory requests slightly below average usage levels, you can improve pod scheduling without risking resource contention. For AI workloads, memory limits are especially important to avoid problems like memory leaks in model-serving containers. These foundational practices create a solid base for dynamic scaling.
Autoscaling strategies add flexibility to handle fluctuating workloads. Horizontal pod autoscaling adjusts the number of replicas based on demand, while vertical pod autoscaling fine-tunes resource allocations for individual pods. For more tailored scaling, custom metrics autoscaling lets you use specific indicators like inference queue length or GPU usage instead of generic CPU metrics.
Time-based scaling is a great way to save costs for workloads with predictable patterns. For example, if your AI applications see higher demand during business hours, you can schedule scaling to reduce resources during off-peak times. This is especially useful for batch processing tasks or development environments.
On top of these strategies, cost management controls act as safeguards to prevent unnecessary expenses. Project-level quotas set limits on resource usage, with higher allowances for production workloads and stricter limits for experimental projects. Limit ranges ensure resources aren’t accidentally over-allocated.
Hybrid deployment strategies can strike the ideal balance between cost and performance. For instance, you could run lightweight preprocessing tasks on OpenShift while shifting compute-heavy model inference to pay-as-you-go platforms like NanoGPT. This way, you can handle sensitive data processing in-house while optimizing costs for more demanding tasks.
To create an effective AI deployment on OpenShift, start with solid resource allocation and basic autoscaling. As your workloads grow, incorporate advanced features like custom metrics and scheduled scaling. Regularly monitor and tweak your setup to ensure it meets your application's needs while staying within budget.
To manage resources effectively in OpenShift, the first step is to configure resource requests and limits for each container. This ensures that workloads get the resources they need without over-allocating. Keep an eye on actual usage and tweak these settings as necessary to align with current demand.
Another key strategy is to enable autoscaling with practical minimum and maximum thresholds. This helps maintain application performance while keeping costs under control. With autoscaling, you can avoid wasting resources during low-demand periods and ensure sufficient capacity during busy times. Adjusting these parameters carefully can strike the right balance between efficiency and cost management.
To make Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) and Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) work well together, careful configuration is key to prevent them from stepping on each other's toes. HPA focuses on scaling the number of pods based on workload metrics, like CPU or memory usage, while VPA fine-tunes resource requests and limits for individual pods. To use both effectively, you need to define their roles clearly.
A good approach is to let HPA manage scaling by adjusting the number of pods dynamically, while setting VPA to "recommendation mode." In this mode, VPA suggests ideal resource settings without directly applying changes. This way, HPA can do its job without interference, and VPA still provides useful insights to help optimize resource allocation. By keeping their responsibilities distinct, you can improve efficiency and avoid potential conflicts.
Using pay-as-you-go platforms like NanoGPT offers a practical way to manage costs by charging solely for the AI model usage you actually need. This eliminates hefty upfront investments and prevents wasting money on underused resources.
This approach is particularly helpful when scaling AI models on OpenShift. It allows for dynamic workload adjustments without the risk of overprovisioning. By tying expenses directly to real-time usage, businesses can handle changing AI demands effectively while keeping their budgets in check.
