Browse all Anthropic text models
Provider logo

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5:thinking
Provider logo

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5:thinking

Adds extended, step‑by‑step reasoning for tougher coding, planning, and multi‑tool tasks. Ideal for long‑horizon agent workflows, complex problem solving, and scenarios that benefit from explicit thinking traces.

Added Sep 29, 2025

Context Window

1.0M

Max Output

64.0K

Avg output tokens (7d)

1.0K tokens

69%

Input Price (Auto)

$3.00/1M

Output Price (Auto)

$15.00/1M

Cache Read (Auto)

$0.30/1M

Capabilities

Benchmarks

Performance metrics and benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

21.2

Better than 70% of models compared

Coding Index

52.1

Better than 61% of models compared

Agentic Index

17.5

Better than 53% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

14.1%

Better than 41% of models compared

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

712 Elo

Better than 35% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

989 Elo

Better than 46% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

5.2%

Better than 30% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

72.3%

Better than 72% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

17.8%

Better than 68% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

57.3%

Better than 68% of models compared

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

0.0%

Better than 18% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

45.7%

Better than 45% of models compared

LiveCodeBench

Contamination-free coding benchmark

71.4%

Better than 82% of models compared

Math

AIME 2025

American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025

88.0%

Better than 86% of models compared

Knowledge

MMLU-Pro

Professional and academic subject knowledge

87.5%

Better than 98% of models compared

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

83.4%

Better than 73% of models compared

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Agentic coding and terminal use

35.6%

Better than 82% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

78.1%

Better than 68% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

72.3%

Better than 72% of models compared

Last updated Sep 11, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Auto routing is available for this model. Explicit provider selection is not available.

Loading provider options…

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking with similar models from the same provider or model family.