Google's frontier-performance Flash model for multimodal and agentic workloads, including coding, tool use, image understanding, PDF and document extraction, audio, and video. Google reports 65.3% on DeepSWE v1.1, up from 49.0% for Gemini 3.6 Flash, and 34% on GDP.pdf, up from 14%.
Added Aug 13, 2026
Context Window
1.0M
Max Output
65.5K
Input Price (Auto)
$0.75/1M
Output Price (Auto)
$3.75/1M
Cache Read (Auto)
$0.075/1M
Capabilities
Benchmarks
Benchmarks
Performance metrics and benchmarks
Sourced from Artificial Analysis.
Intelligence Index
39.1
Coding Index
76.1
Agentic Index
35.2
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation with guardrail penalties
62.0%
Better than 92% of models compared
Harvey LAB-AA
Legal agentic work criterion pass rate
90.7%
Better than 67% of models compared
AA-Briefcase
Agentic knowledge work (Elo)
1108 Elo
Better than 59% of models compared
GDPval-AA v2
Economically valuable tasks (Elo)
1371 Elo
Better than 77% of models compared
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate
23.6%
Better than 83% of models compared
AA-LCR v1.1
Long context reasoning with updated grading
81.7%
Better than 92% of models compared
MLCR-AA
Medical long-context reasoning
15.0%
Better than 49% of models compared
Reasoning
HLE
Humanity's Last Exam
47.9%
Better than 96% of models compared
CritPt
Research-level physics reasoning
14.3%
Coding
Terminal-Bench v4.0
Practical coding and terminal tasks
13.6%
Better than 72% of models compared
SciCode
Python programming for scientific computing
57.2%
Better than 88% of models compared
Knowledge
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
Proportion of correctly answered questions
55.3%
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses
64.5%
Legacy benchmarks
GPQA Diamond (legacy)
Graduate-level scientific reasoning
94.5%
Better than 99% of models compared
AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)
Long context reasoning evaluation
81.7%
Better than 92% of models compared
GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)
Economically valuable tasks
43.6%
Last updated Sep 23, 2026
Artificial AnalysisProviders
Auto routing is available for this model. Explicit provider selection is not available.
Loading provider options…
Related text models
Compare Gemini 3.7 Flash with similar models from the same provider or model family.
Gemini 3.8 Flash
google/gemini-3.8-flashGoogle's fast multimodal model for agentic workloads, including coding, tool use, image understanding, PDF and document extraction, audio, and video. Its capabilities, limits, reasoning behavior, and pricing currently mirror Gemini 3.7 Flash.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
google/gemini-3.5-flash-liteGoogle's cost-efficient Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite model for high-volume multimodal reasoning, tool use, and structured-output workloads.
Gemini 3.6 Flash
google/gemini-3.6-flashGoogle's GA Flash model delivers near-Pro coding and agentic capability at Flash-tier speed and cost, with improved token efficiency over Gemini 3.5 Flash. It is optimized for multi-step orchestration, full-stack code refactoring, general reasoning, and multimodal workflows.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
google/gemini-3.5-flashGoogle's speed-focused Gemini Flash model for frontier multimodal intelligence across text, images, audio, video, PDFs, and code. Built for agentic coding, reliable tool use, structured outputs, and long-context workflows. Audio input costs $3.00 per million audio tokens.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Thinking
google/gemini-3.5-flash-thinkingGemini 3.5 Flash with higher thinking enabled for harder reasoning, agentic coding, tool use, multimodal analysis, and long-context workflows. Audio input costs $3.00 per million audio tokens.
Gemini Flash Latest
google/gemini-flash-latestCompatibility alias that routes to the newest version of Gemini Flash. Currently routes to Gemini 3.8 Flash.