Mistral Medium 3.5 Thinking

Mistral Medium 3.5 with reasoning enabled by default (reasoning_effort=high), for complex coding, agentic, and multi-step reasoning prompts.

  • Reasoning
  • Vision
  • Tool Calling
  • Structured Output

Added Apr 30, 2026

Pricing

Auto routing · per 1M tokens
Input
$1.50
Output
$7.50
Compare provider prices

Specifications

Context window
256K
Max output
32.8K
Parameters
128B
Avg output (7d)
2.4K tokens
Longer than 95% of models

Benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

14.2

Better than 54% of models compared

Coding Index

46.9

Better than 56% of models compared

Agentic Index

7.0

Better than 40% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

6.3%

Better than 31% of models compared

AutomationBench-AA Tasks Completed

Fully completed workflows without guardrail violations

0.3%

Better than 3% of models compared

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work criterion pass rate

69.1%

Better than 15% of models compared

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

521 Elo

Better than 25% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

747 Elo

Better than 36% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

2.8%

Better than 17% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

69.3%

Better than 61% of models compared

MLCR-AA

Medical long-context reasoning

1.7%

Better than 9% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

13.8%

Better than 60% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

68.8%

Better than 82% of models compared

CritPt

Research-level physics reasoning

0.0%

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

0.0%

Better than 16% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

40.2%

Better than 27% of models compared

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Proportion of correctly answered questions

24.7%

AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses

81.6%

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

74.8%

Better than 56% of models compared

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Agentic coding and terminal use

33.3%

Better than 77% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

94.2%

Better than 92% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

69.3%

Better than 61% of models compared

GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)

Economically valuable tasks

12.4%

Last updated Oct 2, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Auto routing is available for this model. Explicit provider selection is not available.

Loading provider options…