Mistral Medium 3.5 Thinking
Mistral Medium 3.5 with reasoning enabled by default (reasoning_effort=high), for complex coding, agentic, and multi-step reasoning prompts.
- Reasoning
- Vision
- Tool Calling
- Structured Output
Added Apr 30, 2026
Pricing
Auto routing · per 1M tokens- Input
- $1.50
- Output
- $7.50
Specifications
- Context window
- 256K
- Max output
- 32.8K
- Parameters
- 128B
- Avg output (7d)
- 2.4K tokens
- Longer than 95% of models
Benchmarks
Benchmarks
Sourced from Artificial Analysis.
Intelligence Index
14.2
Coding Index
46.9
Agentic Index
7.0
Agentic work
AutomationBench-AA
Workflow automation with guardrail penalties
6.3%
Better than 31% of models compared
AutomationBench-AA Tasks Completed
Fully completed workflows without guardrail violations
0.3%
Better than 3% of models compared
Harvey LAB-AA
Legal agentic work criterion pass rate
69.1%
Better than 15% of models compared
AA-Briefcase
Agentic knowledge work (Elo)
521 Elo
Better than 25% of models compared
GDPval-AA v2
Economically valuable tasks (Elo)
747 Elo
Better than 36% of models compared
Document reasoning
GDP.pdf
Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate
2.8%
Better than 17% of models compared
AA-LCR v1.1
Long context reasoning with updated grading
69.3%
Better than 61% of models compared
MLCR-AA
Medical long-context reasoning
1.7%
Better than 9% of models compared
Reasoning
HLE
Humanity's Last Exam
13.8%
Better than 60% of models compared
IFBench
Instruction-following benchmark
68.8%
Better than 82% of models compared
CritPt
Research-level physics reasoning
0.0%
Coding
Terminal-Bench v4.0
Practical coding and terminal tasks
0.0%
Better than 16% of models compared
SciCode
Python programming for scientific computing
40.2%
Better than 27% of models compared
Knowledge
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
Proportion of correctly answered questions
24.7%
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses
81.6%
Legacy benchmarks
GPQA Diamond (legacy)
Graduate-level scientific reasoning
74.8%
Better than 56% of models compared
Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)
Agentic coding and terminal use
33.3%
Better than 77% of models compared
T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)
Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios
94.2%
Better than 92% of models compared
AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)
Long context reasoning evaluation
69.3%
Better than 61% of models compared
GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)
Economically valuable tasks
12.4%
Last updated Oct 2, 2026
Artificial AnalysisProviders
Auto routing is available for this model. Explicit provider selection is not available.
Loading provider options…