Nvidia Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B Thinking

Nvidia's Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B model from the Nemotron 3 family. It uses a hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE architecture. Provider-specific context limits vary, with the longest current route supporting up to 1M context. Thinking enabled.

  • Reasoning
  • Tool Calling
  • Parallel Tool Calls

Added Jun 4, 2026

Model weights

Pricing

Auto routing · per 1M tokens
Input
$0.50
Output
$2.50
Cache read
$0.15
Compare provider prices

Specifications

Context window
1M
Max output
65.5K
Parameters
550B / 55B
Total / active
Avg output (7d)
642 tokens
Longer than 52% of models

Benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

22.9

Better than 71% of models compared

Coding Index

49.3

Better than 58% of models compared

Agentic Index

20.1

Better than 59% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

3.0%

Better than 23% of models compared

AutomationBench-AA Tasks Completed

Fully completed workflows without guardrail violations

0.3%

Better than 3% of models compared

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work criterion pass rate

81.7%

Better than 24% of models compared

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

876 Elo

Better than 40% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

1017 Elo

Better than 47% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

5.0%

Better than 24% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

79.3%

Better than 84% of models compared

MLCR-AA

Medical long-context reasoning

11.1%

Better than 33% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

28.4%

Better than 76% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

81.4%

Better than 99% of models compared

CritPt

Research-level physics reasoning

3.1%

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

0.5%

Better than 36% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

40.3%

Better than 28% of models compared

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Proportion of correctly answered questions

22.6%

AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses

29.7%

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

86.7%

Better than 82% of models compared

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Agentic coding and terminal use

36.4%

Better than 83% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

83.3%

Better than 73% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

79.3%

Better than 84% of models compared

GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)

Economically valuable tasks

25.0%

Last updated Oct 3, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Choose explicit providers for this model. Auto routing remains available as the default option.

Loading provider options…