Browse all OpenAI text models
Provider logo

GPT 5 Mini

openai/gpt-5-mini
Provider logo

GPT 5 Mini

openai/gpt-5-mini

A lightweight version of GPT-5 for cost-sensitive applications. Balances advanced capabilities with efficient resource usage.

Added Aug 7, 2025

Context Window

400.0K

Max Output

128.0K

Avg output tokens (7d)

663 tokens

55%

Input Price (Auto)

$0.25/1M

Output Price (Auto)

$2.00/1M

Cache Read (Auto)

$0.025/1M

Capabilities

Benchmarks

Performance metrics and benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

17.4

Better than 64% of models compared

Coding Index

15.6

Better than 18% of models compared

Agentic Index

8.9

Better than 39% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

6.5%

Better than 36% of models compared

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

438 Elo

Better than 23% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

880 Elo

Better than 41% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

8.4%

Better than 39% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

72.3%

Better than 72% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

21.5%

Better than 73% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

75.4%

Better than 93% of models compared

CritPt

Research-level physics reasoning

0.0%

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

0.0%

Better than 17% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

39.0%

Better than 25% of models compared

LiveCodeBench

Contamination-free coding benchmark

83.8%

Better than 95% of models compared

Math

AIME 2025

American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025

90.7%

Better than 91% of models compared

Knowledge

MMLU-Pro

Professional and academic subject knowledge

83.7%

Better than 86% of models compared

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Proportion of correctly answered questions

25.0%

AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses

56.4%

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

82.8%

Better than 72% of models compared

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Agentic coding and terminal use

33.3%

Better than 77% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

68.4%

Better than 61% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

72.3%

Better than 72% of models compared

GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)

Economically valuable tasks

19.0%

Last updated Sep 13, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Auto routing is available for this model. Explicit provider selection is not available.

Loading provider options…