Qwen3.7 Plus Thinking

Qwen3.7 Plus with thinking mode enabled for deeper multimodal reasoning, coding, tool use, screen reading, and productivity workflows.

  • Reasoning
  • Vision
  • Video Input

Added Jun 1, 2026

Pricing

Auto routing · per 1M tokens
Input
$0.40
Output
$1.60
Cache read
$0.080
Compare provider prices

Specifications

Context window
983.6K
Max output
65.5K
Avg output (7d)
1.5K tokens
Longer than 83% of models

Benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

25.2

Better than 76% of models compared

Coding Index

55.9

Better than 67% of models compared

Agentic Index

17.5

Better than 55% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

17.4%

Better than 39% of models compared

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work criterion pass rate

81.8%

Better than 25% of models compared

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

912 Elo

Better than 42% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

756 Elo

Better than 36% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

12.2%

Better than 48% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

73.0%

Better than 69% of models compared

MLCR-AA

Medical long-context reasoning

9.4%

Better than 29% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

35.6%

Better than 83% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

78.0%

Better than 97% of models compared

CritPt

Research-level physics reasoning

9.1%

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

1.0%

Better than 42% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

46.1%

Better than 42% of models compared

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Proportion of correctly answered questions

22.5%

AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses

27.7%

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

90.0%

Better than 89% of models compared

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Agentic coding and terminal use

47.0%

Better than 94% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

93.0%

Better than 89% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

73.0%

Better than 69% of models compared

GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)

Economically valuable tasks

12.8%

Last updated Oct 1, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Choose explicit providers for this model. Auto routing remains available as the default option.

Loading provider options…