Browse all Z.AI text models
Provider logo

GLM 5.2 Thinking

z-ai/glm-5.2:thinking
Provider logo

GLM 5.2 Thinking

z-ai/glm-5.2:thinking

GLM-5.2 with thinking enabled for harder long-horizon coding, autonomous agent workflows, complex engineering optimization, and real-world development tasks.

Added Jun 15, 2026

Model weights

Context Window

1.0M

Max Output

131.1K

Avg output tokens (7d)

1.6K tokens

82%

Input Price (Auto)

$0.42/1M

Output Price (Auto)

$1.32/1M

Cache Read (Auto)

$0.078/1M

Capabilities

Benchmarks

Performance metrics and benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

38.6

Better than 92% of models compared

Coding Index

68.8

Better than 80% of models compared

Agentic Index

39.4

Better than 77% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

28.4%

Better than 53% of models compared

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

1234 Elo

Better than 69% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

1418 Elo

Better than 79% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

10.4%

Better than 46% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

78.3%

Better than 84% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

41.1%

Better than 92% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

73.3%

Better than 91% of models compared

CritPt

Research-level physics reasoning

20.9%

Coding

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Legacy fallback · Agentic coding and terminal use

50.8%

Better than 95% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

51.2%

Better than 63% of models compared

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Proportion of correctly answered questions

24.3%

AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses

26.3%

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

89.5%

Better than 87% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

99.1%

Better than 99% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

78.3%

Better than 84% of models compared

GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)

Economically valuable tasks

45.9%

Last updated Sep 11, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Choose explicit providers for this model. Auto routing remains available as the default option.

Loading provider options…

Compare GLM 5.2 Thinking with similar models from the same provider or model family.