Browse all Tee text models
Provider logo

GLM 5.2 Thinking TEE

TEE/glm-5.2:thinking
Provider logo

GLM 5.2 Thinking TEE

TEE/glm-5.2:thinking

GLM-5.2 with thinking enabled for harder long-horizon coding, autonomous agent workflows, and complex engineering tasks. Running inside a TEE (Trusted Execution Environment), with attestation support.

Added Jun 16, 2026

Model weights

Context Window

1.0M

Max Output

131.1K

Input Price (Auto)

$1.40/1M

Output Price (Auto)

$4.40/1M

Cache Read (Auto)

$0.70/1M

Capabilities

Benchmarks

Performance metrics and benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

34.0

Better than 89% of models compared

Coding Index

68.8

Better than 80% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

28.4%

Better than 54% of models compared

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

1231 Elo

Better than 69% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

1406 Elo

Better than 78% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

10.4%

Better than 46% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

78.3%

Better than 84% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

41.1%

Better than 92% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

73.3%

Better than 91% of models compared

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

1.0%

Better than 46% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

51.2%

Better than 65% of models compared

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

89.5%

Better than 87% of models compared

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Agentic coding and terminal use

50.8%

Better than 95% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

99.1%

Better than 99% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

78.3%

Better than 84% of models compared

Last updated Sep 18, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Choose explicit providers for this model. Auto routing remains available as the default option.

Loading provider options…

Compare GLM 5.2 Thinking TEE with similar models from the same provider or model family.

GLM 5.3 TEE

TEE/glm-5.3

GLM-5.3 is Z.AI's open-weight reasoning model for complex software engineering, autonomous agents, vulnerability research, and long-horizon tasks. Reasoning is always on; choose low, high, or max reasoning effort (defaults to max). This text-only TEE deployment is verified through the selected provider: Redpill attestation with signed completion receipts or the official Tinfoil SDK's ATC/EHBP verification.

GLM 5.3 Flash TEE

TEE/glm-5.3-flash

GLM-5.3 Flash is Z.AI's natively multimodal 320B MoE reasoning model with 18B active parameters. This TEE deployment is verified through the selected provider: Redpill attestation with signed completion receipts or the official Tinfoil SDK's ATC/EHBP verification.

GLM 5.2 TEE

TEE/glm-5.2

GLM-5.2 is Z.AI's flagship model for long-horizon tasks and autonomous workflows, with a 1M-token context window. Running inside a TEE (Trusted Execution Environment), with attestation support.

GLM 5.1 TEE

TEE/glm-5.1

GLM-5.1 is Z.AI's next-gen model optimized for long-horizon agent workflows and deep reasoning. Running inside a TEE (Trusted Execution Environment), with provider attestation support.

GLM 5.1 Thinking TEE

TEE/glm-5.1-thinking

GLM-5.1 with extended reasoning mode for multi-step planning and tool-heavy workflows. Running inside a TEE (Trusted Execution Environment), with provider attestation support.

GLM 5.3 Flash

z-ai/glm-5.3-flash

ox-alpha out of stealth! GLM-5.3 Flash is Z.ai's first natively multimodal GLM-5 model, with 320B total parameters and just 18B active parameters for efficient coding, agentic work, and precise 1M-token context. Its hybrid sparse-and-linear attention architecture helps it outperform GLM-5.2 at one-tenth the price while approaching Claude Opus 4.8 on coding and agentic benchmarks.